The Extradition of Ruth Lawrence to Ireland Brings Closure to a Nine-Year Manhunt

1 min read
extradition ruth lawrence

The extradition of Ruth Lawrence from South Africa to Ireland marks a significant milestone in pursuing justice for the families of Eoin O’Connor and Anthony Keegan. This article presents an overview of the case, including its background, the extradition process, and what happens next.


In 2014, two close friends, Eoin O’Connor and Anthony Keegan were brutally murdered and buried in a shallow grave, each with a gunshot wound to the head. Ruth Lawrence and her then-boyfriend, Neville van der Westhuizen, were accused of the crime. Following the murders, the couple fled to South Africa, where they worked as traveling tattoo artists.

The Extradition Process

In October 2021, the South African police arrested Lawrence at her rented bungalow in Bloemfontein. Van der Westhuizen was already in custody, having been convicted in 2020 of culpable homicide unrelated to the double murder case. Lawrence hid her identity while staying in South Africa and chose not to resist extradition. She even volunteered to pay for her flight back to Dublin.

Before the extradition, Lawrence spent seven months behind bars in a “hell hole” holding cell at a Bloemfontein police station. Upon her arrival in Ireland, Lawrence is expected to be formally charged with the murders of O’Connor and Keegan.

What Happens Next

The extradition of Ruth Lawrence comes as a relief to the families of both murdered men, who have been informed that Lawrence is now in the custody of the Irish police. A South African National Prosecuting Authority spokesman commented on the extradition process: “As Ruth Lawrence did not object to extradition, it was relatively easy to do the paperwork.”

It has been alleged that Lawrence and Van der Westhuizen owed significant debts to a Dublin drug gang, leading to the murders of O’Connor and Keegan. While Van der Westhuizen is not facing extradition until he completes his 15-year sentence, he is expected to stand trial for the double murder once his current sentence is served.

As the prime suspect is flown back to Ireland and the wheels of justice begin to turn, the long-awaited trial will reveal the truth behind the brutal killings and demonstrate the tireless efforts of law enforcement agencies worldwide. The extradition indicates that justice will always be served no matter how long it takes.

Environmentalist and Outdoor Enthusiast. Amanda is a nature-loving, energetic, and enthusiastic environmentalist who has dedicated her life to exploring and protecting Cape Town's stunning natural landscapes. She is an experienced hiker, wildlife enthusiast, and advocate for sustainable tourism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

The Challenge facing South African Golfers in the 2023 US Open

Next Story

Belly of the Beast: A Gastronomic Journey in the Heart of Cape Town

Latest from Blog

Collaborative Efforts to Enhance Tourism Safety in South Africa

South African Minister of Tourism, Patricia de Lille, recently convened a meeting with various stakeholders to address safety concerns in the tourism industry. The goal of this gathering was to discuss and develop an action plan that would address existing challenges and enhance the safety of tourists visiting South Africa.

SARAFINA!: A Timeless Film Honored at Cannes Film Festival

The Cannes Film Festival paid tribute to a classic piece of South African cinema this year. SARAFINA!, an iconic film, received a standing ovation at the prestigious festival, 31 years after its release. Producer Anant Singh and star Leleti Khumalo were present at Cannes for the historic moment. The film was screened in the Cannes Classics section.

Social Housing Company Wins Legal Battle Against Biased Magistrate

Communicare, a social housing company based in Cape Town, has recently won a legal battle against an allegedly biased acting magistrate who denied an eviction order in favor of the company. The company sought recourse through the Western Cape High Court, citing the Superior Courts Act, which contends that a presiding officer’s bias, malice, or corruption can lead to gross irregularities in proceedings.