Tensions between residents of Mandela Park and the nearby informal settlements of Siyakhana and Siyahlala have boiled over into violent conflict over a disputed piece of land. Shack dwellers have been attacked by Mandela Park residents, resulting in the burning and destruction of their homes.
The Land Dispute
The contested land, originally allocated for the Mahama housing project, was occupied by residents during the Covid pandemic. The City of Cape Town subsequently declared the land lost for housing. However, Mandela Park residents, including backyarders who hope to benefit from the housing project, are demanding that the land be cleared.
Attempted Resolution
City of Cape Town’s Portfolio Committee on Human Settlements chairperson, Anda Ntsodo, attempted to defuse the situation by emphasizing the benefits of the Mahama project for 2,000 families and calling for peace. Community leader Sibongile Mzondi agreed but insisted that the shack dwellers should not be forced off the land without an alternative location. Thando Aba, chairperson of Mandela Park Backyarders, maintained that they would “clean the land” regardless.
Ward Councillor’s Proposal
Ward councillor Rider Mkutswana urged residents of the informal settlements to compile a list of households to identify those who reside on the land and explore options for their relocation. Mkutswana added that he would request the City to fence the land and ensure that it remains vacant.
Violence and Destruction
Several violent incidents have occurred, including the stabbing of a Siyakhana shack dweller who was patrolling the area. Mandela Park residents attempted to burn a shack, resulting in the victim sustaining multiple stab wounds. The victim was treated and discharged from Khayelitsha District Hospital. Shack dwellers also reported the burning and demolition of their homes, leading to their fear of future attacks.
Seeking Justice
The shack dwellers have reported the incidents to the station commander at Harare police station. The commander directed them to add their accounts to an existing case against formal house residents.
As the conflict between the two communities rages on, the future of the disputed land and the people who call it home remain uncertain. A peaceful resolution is needed, but the path towards achieving it remains unclear.
