Legal Battle Over Mining Rights Extension - Cape Town Today
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Legal Battle Over Mining Rights Extension

1 min read
mining rights environmental approvals

A pivotal legal battle is currently underway in South Africa, with significant implications for the future regulation of mining in the country, particularly environmental approvals and public participation.

The Challenged Mining Rights

Trans Hex Operations (Pty) Ltd holds ten diamond mining rights on the West Coast, stretching along an 85km stretch of coastline, between Lamberts Bay and Sout River to the north. These rights were granted between 1994 and 1998 under the Minerals Act of 1991.

The Challenge and its Grounds

An environmental non-profit organization, Protect the West Coast, and small-scale fishers from Doringbaai and the Olifants River estuary are challenging the awarding of 30-year extensions to these mining rights. The applicants contend that they were not informed about, nor given an opportunity to comment on, these mining rights extensions. They also argue that the environmental management programs (EMPs) on which these mining rights are based are outdated, having been in place for more than 20 years.

The applicants argue that new authorisations are required under the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) and other legislation that came into effect after the original rights were granted.

The Legal Battle and Its Progress

The first section of the application is being heard in the Western Cape High Court this week. The applicants filed an urgent court action on December 18, 2022, after failing to obtain crucial information about the rights extensions from the DMRE through a Promotion of Access to Information (PAIA) application. Their application consists of two parts. Part A, being heard on Tuesday, seeks an interdict to halt any mining activities by Trans Hex and its contractors in the sea concession areas where rights were renewed, pending the resolution of Part B of the application, which challenges the legitimacy of those rights.

The Arguments of the Parties

Mike Schlebach, director of Protect the West Coast, argues that there have been “significant and material” changes in the legal framework governing mining and the environmental impact of mining since the advent of democracy. The environmental obligations for mining are based on “outdated and wholly inadequate” EMPs dating back to 2002, he states.

In his answering affidavit, Ian Hestermann, operations director of Trans Hex, states that the group has been engaged in the exploration, mining, and marketing of West Coast diamonds for almost 60 years. Asserting that Part B of the application has “no prospects of success,” Hestermann states that the applicants “raise a number of unsubstantiated allegations” and that the company’s operations under its mining and prospecting rights and the 2002 EMP are lawful.

The Outcome and its Implications

The outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences for the future regulation of mining in South Africa and serves as yet another reminder of the importance of sustainable and responsible resource extraction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

Blisters for Bread: A Fun Walk for a Good Cause

Next Story

Silent Protests and Disruptions at Cape Town Council Meeting

Latest from Blog

The Debate Over Starlink’s Entry into South Africa: Technological Potential vs. Regulatory Hurdles

The entry of Starlink, Elon Musk’s satellite internet service, into South Africa is facing tough challenges due to local laws that require foreign companies to partner with local investors. Critics argue that these rules slow down internet access, especially in rural areas. Supporters, like former politician Tony Leon, believe that easing these regulations could boost technology and improve relations with the U.S. However, Starlink recently withdrew its application to operate in the country, raising concerns about how South Africa can attract foreign investment while addressing historical inequalities. This debate highlights the struggle between supporting local interests and embracing new technology for a better future.

Unmasking the Veil: The Hidden Campaign of the Trump Administration

The Trump administration’s costcutting efforts, led by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), are shrouded in mystery, raising alarms about honesty in government. With major cuts to global aid, especially in health and education, trust in the administration is fading. Many worry that the figures reported as savings are misleading, and the lack of detailed information on contracts only adds to the confusion. As legal battles unfold, the need for clear communication and accountability becomes even more urgent, reminding us that open governance is crucial for public confidence.

Major Supermarkets Recall Heartland Foods Cereals: A Commitment to Transparency and Accountability

Major supermarket chains like Shoprite and Checkers are recalling Heartland Foods cereals because some labels had wrong nutritional information. Even though they didn’t get any complaints, they want to be honest and keep customers safe. Shoppers can easily return the affected cereals for a full refund, no receipt needed! This recall shows how much these stores care about their customers and keeping food safe.

The South African Housing Market: A Journey Through Economic Terrain

The South African housing market is a tale of two cities. Cape Town’s home prices have shot up by 25%, attracting many buyers despite the rising cost of living, while Johannesburg’s prices have climbed more modestly at 12%, making it a tempting option for those seeking better economic stability. Many people are reconsidering where to live, with some returning to Johannesburg for a sense of comfort and affordability. As economic pressures weigh heavily, both cities tell a story of resilience and adaptation as South Africans navigate their changing world, searching for a place they can call home.

Cape Town’s ‘Invested in Hope’ Budget: A Vision for the Future

Cape Town’s ‘Invested in Hope’ Budget for 2025/26 is a big plan to help the city and its people. With R39.7 billion set aside, the budget focuses on making essential services like water and electricity more affordable for lowerincome families. Mayor Geordin HillLewis shared this vision on a sunny morning, aiming to improve community safety by adding more police officers and reshaping the city’s infrastructure. While some celebrate these changes, others express concerns about added costs and the need for better crime prevention. Overall, this budget hopes to pave the way for a brighter future for all Cape Town residents.