South Africa Headed to ICJ Over Israel-Palestine Conflict - Cape Town Today
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

South Africa Headed to ICJ Over Israel-Palestine Conflict

3 mins read
south africa israel-palestine conflict Cape Town

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has stated that it is South Africa’s moral responsibility to bring Israel’s military actions against Hamas in Gaza to the attention of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as he believes that there is genocide taking place in Israel. Ramaphosa’s decision is rooted in South Africa’s commitment to human rights, which he believes is a cornerstone of their international identity. He has also criticized the newly launched Umkhonto weSizwe party, which has the backing of former President Jacob Zuma, and reiterated the ANC’s leadership role in the country.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has declared that it is South Africa’s moral duty to bring the issue of Israel’s military actions against Hamas in Gaza to the attention of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). According to Ramaphosa, there is genocide taking place in Israel, and they need to provide answers. South Africa’s commitment to human rights is the cornerstone of their international identity.

South Africa’s Duty to Human Rights

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has made a significant statement, insisting that it is South Africa’s moral duty to bring the issue of Israel’s military actions against Hamas in Gaza to the attention of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). This bold declaration, which centers around a claim of genocide committed by Israel, was made during the 112th anniversary celebrations of the African National Congress (ANC) in Mbombela.

President Ramaphosa’s decision to bring this matter before the ICJ is rooted in South Africa’s staunch commitment to human rights. This commitment is a cornerstone of South Africa’s international identity, he believes. According to a Times Live report, he stated to party affiliates, “We serve as a benchmark for the world on human rights matters. We also set a precedent in standing firm on an issue of principle to support the struggles of others who are facing similar challenges that we have confronted.”

In President Ramaphosa’s address, the similarities between the struggles endured by the Palestinians and South Africa’s own tumultuous past are clearly evident. In shedding light on the harsh realities of the conflict, President Ramaphosa asserted, “The Palestinian people are being bombed, they are being killed, and there is apartheid in Israel.” In his view, South Africa has a responsibility to rise, voice their opposition, and extend their support to the Palestinians.

The Case Against Israel

Furthering his argument, Ramaphosa explained South Africa’s decision to take the matter to the ICJ. In his words, “That is the reason we have brought the government of Israel before the ICJ. They need to go there and provide answers, as there is genocide taking place in Israel.”

His words are imbued with a courageous defiance as he recognizes the potential risks associated with this position. He acknowledged, “We do this, and some argue it’s a gamble. We are a small nation with a relatively small economy, and they could retaliate against us, but we stand firm on principle.” To him, the essence of their freedom is not confined to their own liberation, but also encompasses the freedom of the Palestinian people. He firmly believes that their own freedom isn’t genuine unless the Palestinians are free too.

This belief, he insists, is rooted in the teachings of Nelson Mandela, revered as the “father of democracy” in South Africa. He further stated, “We were educated by the great Nelson Mandela, which is why we support them. This is why we have such a progressive foreign policy now, one that enables us to intervene to uphold the principles we were taught, even in very distant nations.”

South Africa’s Stand on New Parties and Global Issues

Ramaphosa’s speech also included a critique of the newly launched Umkhonto weSizwe party (MK), which has the backing of former President Jacob Zuma. Zuma has been actively promoting the MK party, regarded by many as a breakaway group of the ANC. “The ANC has demonstrated its capability to lead through its experience, leadership, and structure,” Ramaphosa stated, indirectly challenging the credibility of the new party.

In conclusion, the position assumed by President Ramaphosa is a manifestation of South Africa’s dedication to human rights and its staunch faith in justice. It stands as a testament to the country’s ongoing development amidst multifaceted global problems. Lastly, it emphasizes the ANC’s leadership role, underscoring its experience, structure, and cherished principles.

What did South African President Cyril Ramaphosa state about the Israel-Palestine conflict?

President Cyril Ramaphosa has stated that it is South Africa’s moral responsibility to bring Israel’s military actions against Hamas in Gaza to the attention of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as he believes that there is genocide taking place in Israel.

Why does President Ramaphosa feel it’s South Africa’s duty to bring the issue to the ICJ?

According to Ramaphosa, South Africa’s commitment to human rights is the cornerstone of their international identity, and they need to provide answers to the claim of genocide committed by Israel.

What similarities does President Ramaphosa draw between the Palestinian conflict and South Africa’s past?

President Ramaphosa drew similarities between the struggles endured by the Palestinians and South Africa’s own tumultuous past. In his view, South Africa has a responsibility to rise, voice their opposition, and extend their support to the Palestinians.

Why did President Ramaphosa criticize the Umkhonto weSizwe party?

President Ramaphosa criticized the newly launched Umkhonto weSizwe party, which has the backing of former President Jacob Zuma, and reiterated the ANC’s leadership role in the country. He indirectly challenged the credibility of the new party.

What does President Ramaphosa believe is essential for South Africa’s freedom?

President Ramaphosa firmly believes that their own freedom isn’t genuine unless the Palestinians are free too. This belief is rooted in the teachings of Nelson Mandela, revered as the “father of democracy” in South Africa.

What message does President Ramaphosa’s speech convey?

President Ramaphosa’s speech conveys South Africa’s dedication to human rights and its staunch faith in justice. It emphasizes the ANC’s leadership role, underscoring its experience, structure, and cherished principles.

Previous Story

The AFCON 2023 Fever: South Africa’s National Team Gears Up

Next Story

Taking the Helm of Visual Wellness: Ensuring Optimal Eye Health in 2024

Latest from Blog

The Debate Over Starlink’s Entry into South Africa: Technological Potential vs. Regulatory Hurdles

The entry of Starlink, Elon Musk’s satellite internet service, into South Africa is facing tough challenges due to local laws that require foreign companies to partner with local investors. Critics argue that these rules slow down internet access, especially in rural areas. Supporters, like former politician Tony Leon, believe that easing these regulations could boost technology and improve relations with the U.S. However, Starlink recently withdrew its application to operate in the country, raising concerns about how South Africa can attract foreign investment while addressing historical inequalities. This debate highlights the struggle between supporting local interests and embracing new technology for a better future.

Unmasking the Veil: The Hidden Campaign of the Trump Administration

The Trump administration’s costcutting efforts, led by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), are shrouded in mystery, raising alarms about honesty in government. With major cuts to global aid, especially in health and education, trust in the administration is fading. Many worry that the figures reported as savings are misleading, and the lack of detailed information on contracts only adds to the confusion. As legal battles unfold, the need for clear communication and accountability becomes even more urgent, reminding us that open governance is crucial for public confidence.

Major Supermarkets Recall Heartland Foods Cereals: A Commitment to Transparency and Accountability

Major supermarket chains like Shoprite and Checkers are recalling Heartland Foods cereals because some labels had wrong nutritional information. Even though they didn’t get any complaints, they want to be honest and keep customers safe. Shoppers can easily return the affected cereals for a full refund, no receipt needed! This recall shows how much these stores care about their customers and keeping food safe.

The South African Housing Market: A Journey Through Economic Terrain

The South African housing market is a tale of two cities. Cape Town’s home prices have shot up by 25%, attracting many buyers despite the rising cost of living, while Johannesburg’s prices have climbed more modestly at 12%, making it a tempting option for those seeking better economic stability. Many people are reconsidering where to live, with some returning to Johannesburg for a sense of comfort and affordability. As economic pressures weigh heavily, both cities tell a story of resilience and adaptation as South Africans navigate their changing world, searching for a place they can call home.

Cape Town’s ‘Invested in Hope’ Budget: A Vision for the Future

Cape Town’s ‘Invested in Hope’ Budget for 2025/26 is a big plan to help the city and its people. With R39.7 billion set aside, the budget focuses on making essential services like water and electricity more affordable for lowerincome families. Mayor Geordin HillLewis shared this vision on a sunny morning, aiming to improve community safety by adding more police officers and reshaping the city’s infrastructure. While some celebrate these changes, others express concerns about added costs and the need for better crime prevention. Overall, this budget hopes to pave the way for a brighter future for all Cape Town residents.