Substantial Seizure by the South African Reserve Bank: The Berdine Odendaal Story - Cape Town Today
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Substantial Seizure by the South African Reserve Bank: The Berdine Odendaal Story

3 mins read
financial accountability asset seizure

The South African Reserve Bank has seized over R60 million in assets and cash from Berdine Odendaal, the partner of the late Markus Jooste, who had profited from Jooste’s ill-acquired wealth. Despite legal battles and appeals, the Reserve Bank forfeited the confiscated assets, illuminating the significant impact of regulatory oversight and ethical business behavior. This serves as a warning to others wielding power, highlighting the significance of ethical behavior in business transactions, and the repercussions that follow breaches of these principles.

The Seizure of Berdine Odendaal’s Assets by the South African Reserve Bank

The South African Reserve Bank has seized over R60 million in assets and cash from Berdine Odendaal, the partner of late Markus Jooste. Odendaal had profited from Jooste’s ill-acquired wealth through 12 loans totaling R60.5 million transferred via his equestrian enterprise, Mayfair Speculators. Despite legal battles and appeals, the Reserve Bank forfeited the confiscated assets, illuminating the significant impact of regulatory oversight and ethical business behavior.

The Seizure of Assets

In an impressive chronicle of affluence, authority, and recompense, the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) has recently taken possession of more than R60 million in assets and cash from Berdine Odendaal, the partner of the late Markus Jooste. The confiscated riches were later surrendered to the state, a notable move that highlights the Bank’s dedication to endorsing financial accountability and honesty.

Jooste, a previously dominant player in the business sphere, met his end by his own hand in March, right as law enforcement was preparing to apprehend him. His demise coincided with the unveiling by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) of the findings of its investigation into the downfall of Steinhoff International Holdings NV. With the remnants of his corporate kingdom still burning, Jooste was posthumously dealt a substantial administrative fine of R475 million.

A Complex Relationship and Its Benefits

Adding a layer of fascination to this story is Jooste’s connection with Berdine Odendaal, and the degree to which she profited from his ill-acquired wealth. According to multiple sources, Jooste had transferred 12 loans to Odendaal, totaling an astonishing R60.5 million, via his equestrian enterprise, Mayfair Speculators.

However, the money did not stay unspent for long. In May 2021, the Reserve Bank, demonstrating its authority, issued a preservation order on the funds. This action triggered a legal battle between Odendaal and the SARB.

In a last-ditch effort to recover some of the funds, Odendaal appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in February, with the uncommon plea for the SARB to supply her with R150,000 per month for personal expenses. Her application shed light on the extravagant lifestyle she had become used to, with her monthly costs including R70,000 for stabling her polo ponies, R10,000 for beauty treatments, vitamins and cosmetics, R5,000 for apparel, and R4,000 for her domestic help.

Current Status and the Future

Despite the forfeiture of the confiscated assets, Odendaal is far from being impoverished. She owns a residence in Pretoria and a plot at the Mabalingwe Nature Reserve in Limpopo. Nevertheless, the fate of these properties hangs in the balance, with uncertainty as to whether they too will be subjected to the SARB’s seizure scrutiny.

The SARB’s measures in this situation manifest its determination to maintain financial stability and propriety. It serves as a reminder that regardless of how high one might climb, the extensive reach of the law, along with the regulatory oversight of bodies like the SARB, is always looming. And when it eventually catches up, the descent can be just as spectacular as the ascent.

Lessons Learnt and a Warning Issued

This narrative serves as a warning to others wielding power. It highlights the significance of ethical behavior in business transactions, and the repercussions that follow breaches of these principles. In conclusion, the SARB’s resolute action against Odendaal is not merely about recuperating ill-gotten wealth, but also about delivering a potent message: that prosperity gained through questionable means will not go unpunished, and that eventually, justice will prevail.

1. What was seized by the South African Reserve Bank from Berdine Odendaal?

The South African Reserve Bank seized over R60 million in assets and cash from Berdine Odendaal, the partner of the late Markus Jooste.

2. Why did the South African Reserve Bank seize Berdine Odendaal’s assets?

Berdine Odendaal had profited from Markus Jooste’s ill-acquired wealth through 12 loans totaling R60.5 million transferred via his equestrian enterprise, Mayfair Speculators. The Reserve Bank seized the assets as a result of this.

3. Did Berdine Odendaal appeal the seizure of her assets by the South African Reserve Bank?

Yes, Berdine Odendaal appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in February, with the uncommon plea for the SARB to supply her with R150,000 per month for personal expenses.

4. Is Berdine Odendaal’s personal property safe from seizure?

The fate of Berdine Odendaal’s properties, including her residence in Pretoria and a plot at the Mabalingwe Nature Reserve in Limpopo, hangs in the balance, with uncertainty as to whether they too will be subjected to the SARB’s seizure scrutiny.

5. What lesson can be learned from the story of Berdine Odendaal and the South African Reserve Bank?

The story serves as a warning to others wielding power and highlights the significance of ethical behavior in business transactions, and the repercussions that follow breaches of these principles.

6. Why did Markus Jooste receive a fine of R475 million after his death?

Markus Jooste was posthumously dealt a substantial administrative fine of R475 million, following the unveiling by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) of the findings of its investigation into the downfall of Steinhoff International Holdings NV.

Previous Story

South Africa’s Leap Forward in Environmental Stewardship: The Inception of Community Forestry Agreements

Next Story

**South African Communities Bolstered by Sustainable Forest Management Initiatives**

Latest from Blog

The Debate Over Starlink’s Entry into South Africa: Technological Potential vs. Regulatory Hurdles

The entry of Starlink, Elon Musk’s satellite internet service, into South Africa is facing tough challenges due to local laws that require foreign companies to partner with local investors. Critics argue that these rules slow down internet access, especially in rural areas. Supporters, like former politician Tony Leon, believe that easing these regulations could boost technology and improve relations with the U.S. However, Starlink recently withdrew its application to operate in the country, raising concerns about how South Africa can attract foreign investment while addressing historical inequalities. This debate highlights the struggle between supporting local interests and embracing new technology for a better future.

Unmasking the Veil: The Hidden Campaign of the Trump Administration

The Trump administration’s costcutting efforts, led by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), are shrouded in mystery, raising alarms about honesty in government. With major cuts to global aid, especially in health and education, trust in the administration is fading. Many worry that the figures reported as savings are misleading, and the lack of detailed information on contracts only adds to the confusion. As legal battles unfold, the need for clear communication and accountability becomes even more urgent, reminding us that open governance is crucial for public confidence.

Major Supermarkets Recall Heartland Foods Cereals: A Commitment to Transparency and Accountability

Major supermarket chains like Shoprite and Checkers are recalling Heartland Foods cereals because some labels had wrong nutritional information. Even though they didn’t get any complaints, they want to be honest and keep customers safe. Shoppers can easily return the affected cereals for a full refund, no receipt needed! This recall shows how much these stores care about their customers and keeping food safe.

The South African Housing Market: A Journey Through Economic Terrain

The South African housing market is a tale of two cities. Cape Town’s home prices have shot up by 25%, attracting many buyers despite the rising cost of living, while Johannesburg’s prices have climbed more modestly at 12%, making it a tempting option for those seeking better economic stability. Many people are reconsidering where to live, with some returning to Johannesburg for a sense of comfort and affordability. As economic pressures weigh heavily, both cities tell a story of resilience and adaptation as South Africans navigate their changing world, searching for a place they can call home.

Cape Town’s ‘Invested in Hope’ Budget: A Vision for the Future

Cape Town’s ‘Invested in Hope’ Budget for 2025/26 is a big plan to help the city and its people. With R39.7 billion set aside, the budget focuses on making essential services like water and electricity more affordable for lowerincome families. Mayor Geordin HillLewis shared this vision on a sunny morning, aiming to improve community safety by adding more police officers and reshaping the city’s infrastructure. While some celebrate these changes, others express concerns about added costs and the need for better crime prevention. Overall, this budget hopes to pave the way for a brighter future for all Cape Town residents.