The Supreme Court of Appeal Strengthens South Africa’s Fight Against Racism

1 min read
south africa supreme court of appeal

The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in South Africa has ruled that public display of the old South African flag is considered hate speech, unfair discrimination, and harassment based on racial grounds. This decision reinforces the country’s stance against racist behavior and conveys that such actions will be dealt with firmly.

A Landmark Judgment Against Racism

The old South African flag symbolizes the racist and repressive regime of apartheid, and displaying it only perpetuates the violence and brutality of racism. The SCA’s unanimous decision is significant and influential, especially at a time when South Africa has seen a surge in racial tension.

The Case Brought Before the Court

The case was initiated by Afriforum, a South African civil rights group that had played a leading role in the nationwide protests of 2017, called the “Black Monday protests.” During these protests, the old flag was displayed, leading to a complaint against Afriforum by the Nelson Mandela Foundation Trust (NMFT) with the Equality Court sitting in the Johannesburg High Court.

The SCA’s Decision

The SCA’s ruling amended the Equality Court’s earlier judgment, which had banned flag display in private homes. However, the SCA stated that the issue of displaying the flag in private homes had yet to be fully explored and was best left to be decided if and when necessary.

The Debate Around Freedom of Expression

The case has highlighted the ongoing debate surrounding freedom of expression versus hate speech. Afriforum failed to explain why the ban violated the rights to freedom of expression, dignity, and freedom of assembly. Judge Schippers stated that the message conveyed by the gratuitous display of the old flag was based on race – apartheid and white supremacy.

The Way, Forward

The SCA’s judgment is a starting point for further discussions around protecting human rights and combating racism in South Africa. However, it remains to be seen how this decision will be enforced, particularly in private homes. The ruling conveys that South Africa will not tolerate hate speech and discrimination.


The SCA’s ruling is significant in South Africa’s ongoing battle against racism and hate speech. Displaying the old South African flag represents a dark period in the country’s history and is an act of aggression towards those who suffered under apartheid. The decision demonstrates that South Africa is committed to protecting human rights and promoting a society that is free from discrimination and hate.

Environmentalist and Outdoor Enthusiast. Amanda is a nature-loving, energetic, and enthusiastic environmentalist who has dedicated her life to exploring and protecting Cape Town's stunning natural landscapes. She is an experienced hiker, wildlife enthusiast, and advocate for sustainable tourism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

Two Young Boys Murdered in Soweto: Community Seeks Justice and Closure

Next Story

Successful Sentencing of Violent Criminals

Latest from Blog

Collaborative Efforts to Enhance Tourism Safety in South Africa

South African Minister of Tourism, Patricia de Lille, recently convened a meeting with various stakeholders to address safety concerns in the tourism industry. The goal of this gathering was to discuss and develop an action plan that would address existing challenges and enhance the safety of tourists visiting South Africa.

SARAFINA!: A Timeless Film Honored at Cannes Film Festival

The Cannes Film Festival paid tribute to a classic piece of South African cinema this year. SARAFINA!, an iconic film, received a standing ovation at the prestigious festival, 31 years after its release. Producer Anant Singh and star Leleti Khumalo were present at Cannes for the historic moment. The film was screened in the Cannes Classics section.

Social Housing Company Wins Legal Battle Against Biased Magistrate

Communicare, a social housing company based in Cape Town, has recently won a legal battle against an allegedly biased acting magistrate who denied an eviction order in favor of the company. The company sought recourse through the Western Cape High Court, citing the Superior Courts Act, which contends that a presiding officer’s bias, malice, or corruption can lead to gross irregularities in proceedings.