Former Eskom CEO Claims High-Level Political Involvement in Corruption Scandal

1 min read
south africa corruption


The recent claims made by former Eskom CEO, Andre de Ruyter, alleging the involvement of high-level politicians in corruption at the power utility have caused a stir in South Africa. However, de Ruyter declined to disclose any names during a hearing with Parliament’s Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA), citing legal advice and safety concerns.

De Ruyter’s Refusal to Name Politicians

De Ruyter submitted a written statement and presentation to the Committee, but he refused to divulge the names of the politicians allegedly involved in corruption at Eskom. When pushed for answers, he sometimes opted for obfuscation. For instance, when asked to define what a “senior ranking politician” was, he replied, “Here I will again stand by my submission, without casting any aspersions on yourself, you are probably a senior politician, so let’s leave it at that.”

Reasons for Not Naming Individuals

De Ruyter attributed his reluctance to reveal names to legal advice he had received and said naming individuals involved could affect ongoing investigations. He also indicated safety concerns. During the hearing, de Ruyter claimed that a “high-level” politician was involved in corruption at Eskom and that the power utility was a “feeding trough” for the African National Congress (ANC).

Committee’s Response

Despite de Ruyter’s submission, the Committee expressed frustration with his refusal to name the high-level politicians allegedly involved in corruption at Eskom. The Committee Chairperson remarked that they were still at square one, and the questions they had had not been answered. SCOPA members offered de Ruyter Parliamentary immunity, but he still refused to name the politicians.

Implications and Future Developments

De Ruyter’s refusal to name the politicians involved in corruption at Eskom has left many frustrated, wondering about the extent of corruption within the utility and the ANC. As investigations continue, it remains to be seen whether these allegations will be substantiated, and whether those involved will be held accountable. The allegations of corruption within Eskom have long plagued South Africa, and the allegations of high-level political involvement will only add to the concerns. The country will be watching to see how this situation unfolds and whether transparency and accountability are upheld.

Environmentalist and Outdoor Enthusiast. Amanda is a nature-loving, energetic, and enthusiastic environmentalist who has dedicated her life to exploring and protecting Cape Town's stunning natural landscapes. She is an experienced hiker, wildlife enthusiast, and advocate for sustainable tourism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

Explore the Gondwana Private Game Reserve on Foot: The Pioneer Trail

Next Story

Former SA Rugby CEO Ordered to Repay R37 Million to Stellenbosch University

Latest from Blog

Collaborative Efforts to Enhance Tourism Safety in South Africa

South African Minister of Tourism, Patricia de Lille, recently convened a meeting with various stakeholders to address safety concerns in the tourism industry. The goal of this gathering was to discuss and develop an action plan that would address existing challenges and enhance the safety of tourists visiting South Africa.

SARAFINA!: A Timeless Film Honored at Cannes Film Festival

The Cannes Film Festival paid tribute to a classic piece of South African cinema this year. SARAFINA!, an iconic film, received a standing ovation at the prestigious festival, 31 years after its release. Producer Anant Singh and star Leleti Khumalo were present at Cannes for the historic moment. The film was screened in the Cannes Classics section.

Social Housing Company Wins Legal Battle Against Biased Magistrate

Communicare, a social housing company based in Cape Town, has recently won a legal battle against an allegedly biased acting magistrate who denied an eviction order in favor of the company. The company sought recourse through the Western Cape High Court, citing the Superior Courts Act, which contends that a presiding officer’s bias, malice, or corruption can lead to gross irregularities in proceedings.